Kudos issacsname, hilarious article, and it seems sadly true.
Nobody likes a thinker, that's what I learned in school. Introverts are often polymaths as well, and the wider knowledge base you have, the bigger the gap in between you and other people.
2.)People dismiss creative ideas in favor of ideas that are purely practical -- tried and true.
Tell this to Ptolemy and Copernicus...
To realize the truth of this article, we need only glance casually at government, big business, or the military . . .
@hush1
Stop trying to sound smarter than everyone else, you are not...
Your critique of the article and it's associated paper (even though you clearly did not read the whole paper, which is enough to let others see your childish desire to sound smart) is lacking one essential thing: actually making any sense...
Once again, please stop trying to sound smarter than the rest, you are not.
The physical analogy 'blind spot' for the eye is inadmissible.
Outside of math, you can not divide by zero and make sense.
.1)Creative ideas are by definition novel, and novelty can trigger feelings of uncertainty that make most people uncomfortable.
Meanings and definitions change daily (through usage).
3.)Objective evidence shoring up the validity of a creative proposal does not motivate people to accept it.
No such thing: "Objective evidence" or "validity". Creativity do not motivate acceptance. So? What's the author's point?
There is zero reliance on human perception.
POPPYCOCK! There are two kinds of thinkers in this world: Those who truly are innovative and those who only think they are.
The same is true today with hundreds of good ideas unnoticed generally
IMO you'd have to be über creative just to survive on the little that they have.
To uncover bias against creativity, the researchers used a subtle technique **snip** they actually associated creative ideas with negative words such as "vomit," "poison" and "agony."Sounds real subtle.
Hes the guy who does the crappy paintings they hang up in the library, outside the restrooms.
The trick is to use paints that never dry.
Of course people are biased against "creative" ideas. That's because the vast majority of creative ideas are moronic. How often have you been drunk with your friend and he has said something moronic (but creative!) like, "have you ever wondered if like... dude... our entire universe is like inside a single subatomic particle in some other universe!?" There are very, very few creative ideas that are actually worth anything. It is, in general, a waste of one's time to try every new "creative" idea that comes along.
So you are saying the one particle universe idea is only acceptable when brought to the table by people like Dirac, Eddington and Weyl ?
rawa1
Aug 26, 2011Testing of new ideas is unrewarding activity from many reasons: you cannot get the priority credit, you're forced to adopt your research program to foreign ideas instead of the opposite and you're appearing in psychosocially ungrateful position at the moment, when you cannot confirm foreign idea. At the very end, but not least comes trivial psychological motivations, like the rivalry and jealousy.
From this reason, they scientists tend to ignore creative ideas in general, especially under conditions of the current low financial support