[Home]
[Full version]
Analysis of quickly stopped Rx orders provides new tool for reducing medical errors
Jul 18 ,Medicine & Health
By studying medication orders that are withdrawn ("discontinued") by physicians within 45 minutes of their origination, researchers at The University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine have demonstrated a systematic and efficient method of identifying prescribing errors. The method, they say, has value to screen for medication errors and as a teaching tool for physicians and physicians-in-training. The report is published in the July/August 2008 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association.
Dr. Ross Koppel and colleagues at Penn's Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology used a hospital's computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system to track prescriptions that were discontinued within 45 minutes. They found the rate of errors among the quickly stopped orders was 66%. The Rx problem may have been detected by the ordering physician, another physician, a pharmacist, or a nurse, but the prescribing physician issues the stop order.
The University of Pennsylvania team examined each order stopped within a two-hour time period, and when relevant, each subsequent order. Then they interviewed the prescribing physicians, asking about why they stopped the orders–looking at both who caught the error and the doctor's own explanation for the change. Often the reason for the change was obvious, e.g., a medication for the wrong eye, or a dose that was far too large. Sometimes the reasons were more subtle, e.g., a more appropriate antibiotic. Dr. Koppel notes the classes of drugs most likely to be quickly discontinued made sense because they were often among the most difficult-to-prescribe: low therapeutic index drugs, insulin, antiretrovirals, antineoplastics, and immunosuppressive drugs.
Prof. Koppel (a sociologist by training) said that although they originally focused on the two-hour period, they found that 45 minutes was the most efficient time cut for the measure. "Because this type of analysis is so new, we didn't know how long the post-ordering timeframe should be until we did it." By analyzing the discontinued orders within 15-minute time blocks, we were able to glean insights into the most efficacious time parameter to maximize ratios of inappropriate-to-appropriate medication orders.
"Also, we did not count orders that were stopped within the first minute. That's so we didn't include typos and the kind of errors that would be the equivalent to tearing up a flawed paper prescription when writing it," said Koppel.
The researchers had a live transmission of every medication order as it was written, and were able to interview the ordering physicians within hours, often within minutes. The team conducted the research over the course of two months, selecting times and days that reflected the physicians' ordering patterns at the hospital.
Currently, methods of identifying prescribing errors are plagued with inaccuracies stemming from several systematic biases. Self-report and reports by colleagues are known to substantially under-represent reality. Examining medical records misses errors linked to undocumented diagnoses, as well as being time-consuming and expensive. Other manifestations of medication error go unrecognized, write the authors, because symptoms are often complex, patients have multiple problems and polypharmacy may obscure causes and outcomes. The paper identifies eight methods of detecting medication error and summarizes their shortcomings. Koppel added that "prescription errors are often obscured by the messy reality of illness, multi-faceted treatments, and the rapid pace and complexity of an acute care hospital"
The measure proposed here, while preliminary, indicates that 66% of prescriptions discontinued within 45 minutes after their origination are inappropriate. Even beyond the ratio comparisons, the value of this measure is several-fold: When linked to a CPOE system, it is rapid, constant (24/7), and does not depend on possibly biased evaluators, self-report, or others' reports. Data collection is also cost-free as part of a CPOE system.
Moreover, suggested one of the study's co-authors, Brian L. Strom, MD, MPH, Chairman and Professor of the Center for Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics at Penn, "although the remaining proportion of rapidly stopped orders could not be substantiated as inappropriate, it could be argued that almost all of these orders were perceived as problematic by their authors—that is why they stopped them."
Difficulties identifying and measuring medication errors are a constant theme of the hospital patient safety literature. Many scholars indicate such difficulties are critical barriers to addressing medication errors. Koppel added that "Our method does not replace the others, but may add a technique that appears both efficient and objective. It can identify and help physicians who are having problems with a particular group of medications or patient types and can help post-graduate medical educators focus on areas requiring additional training."
Source: University of Pennsylvania
Related stories:
Doctors, economist, write prescription for protecting people from themselves
Policy makers, employers and others can use the science of behavioral economics to steer people toward wiser choices — and dramatically improve their health — without limiting their freedom to do as they please, according to an article published in the Nov. 28 issue of the
Journal of the American Medical Association. The paper was written by researchers at Carnegie Mellon University, the University of Pennsylvania, Aetna Inc. and the Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
Watch out for drug names that look, sound alike
(AP) -- Take the generic drug clonidine for high blood pressure? Double-check that you didn't leave the drugstore with Klonopin for seizures, or the gout medicine colchicine.
Health journalists face translation challenge, researchers find
The media constantly inform the public of new health information, but many Americans have difficulty recognizing what they should, or should not do to improve their health. University of Missouri researchers conducted a national survey and found that the majority of health journalists have not had specialized training in health reporting and face challenges in communicating new medical science developments.
Older people may need less sleep, study finds
Along with all the other changes that come with age, healthy older people also lose some capacity for sleep, according to a new report published online on July 24th in
Current Biology, a Cell Press publication. When asked to stay in bed for 16 hours in the dark each day for several days, younger people get an average of 9 hours of shuteye compared to 7.5 for older people, the researchers report.
Changes in local health care markets affect national patient safety project
A national patient safety initiative involving major corporate employers and employer health care coalitions may set common goals, but success relies greatly on regional health care players and local market factors for actual implementation, says a recent study.
Programs succeed in reducing risky sex among HIV-positive minority men
Research has shown that HIV-positive African American and Hispanic men who were sexually abused as children are particularly vulnerable to engaging in high-risk sex and experiencing depressive symptoms. Yet few HIV intervention programs exist to help them.
7 in 10 patients surveyed hadn't heard of the Summary Care Record
Despite an extensive public information campaign only three in ten people living in the areas piloting the NHS Summary Care Record (SCR) have heard about the programme, according to a study published on bmj.com today.
Brain images show schizophrenic's memory usage differs
T he enduring memory problems that people with schizophrenia experience may be related to differences in how their brains process information, new research has found. The Public Library of Science published the report by Vanderbilt University researchers Junghee Lee, Bradley S. Folley, John Gore and Sohee Park in the online journal
PLOS One on March 12.
[Home]
[Full version]