[Home]   [Full version]  

Does a bad January mean a bad year for share markets?

Jan 30 ,General Science


The Americans call it the January Barometer – the stock market performance for the first month, sets the pattern for the rest of the year. But Massey University finance researchers say while this may hold true for the United States market, the January Barometer is no predictor of how the year will go on international equity markets.

Researchers Dr Ben Marshall and Nuttawat Visaltanachoti, from the Department of Economics and Finance, ran their own analysis on the ability of positive and negative returns from the equity markets in January to forecast positive or negative performance for the following 11 months. They found the January Barometer – a hot topic of discussion in finance circles – stood up only in the US.

“We conclude that just because the US and international markets have started very poorly this does not necessarily mean the next 11 months will be bad,” says Dr Visaltanachoti.

The researchers say that although many quarters of the US finance industry, including news media, quote the January Barometer as a signal of future market performance, the technique is still considered to be an ”open puzzle". They say their analysis is unique due to use of advanced test procedures and consideration of the US and 22 other international markets.

They found in many other countries what happened in January did not foretell returns for the rest of the year. Only Japan and Spain had statistically significant returns in their market that followed on from a positive or negative start in January. However, their advanced test procedures revealed that even in those markets the relationship was relatively weak and may simply be due to chance.

“This finding seems strange and raises the question as to whether the finding in the US is in fact by chance. We are not aware of any institutional reasons why the January Barometer should be so accurate in the US but not in other markets. There appear to be two possible explanations. Perhaps it is a matter of chance or perhaps there are some institutional factors in the US that we are not aware of,” says Dr Visaltanachoti.

Source: Massey University

Related stories:

Subprime lending not main trigger of real estate bubble
(PhysOrg.com) -- Critics often point to subprime mortgage lending – the funding of home loans to borrowers with less-than-perfect credit – as the culprit in the unsustainable boom in U.S. home prices that eventually derailed the real estate and mortgage markets.
Professor explores social behavior and business misdeeds
(PhysOrg.com) -- Corporate misconduct can be the stuff of high drama. But prevailing theory has it that "settling up," the process of meting out consequences for corporate misdeeds, is largely determined by quite rational, unbiased financial markets and often the legal system.
Offshoring: Where's the value?
U.S. firms that offshore customer service may save money on labor costs, but they also pay the price in terms of unhappy customers, say University of Michigan researchers.
Corruption is Expensive, But Who Pays the Bills?
One often must look no further than today’s headlines to find examples of personal failure, corporate financial woes and political corruption. But how does political integrity affect the bottom line? A University of Missouri researcher has found that state corruption and political connections have strong effects on the economy and that higher state corruption is associated with greater credit risk, higher bond yields, increased use of external credit enhancements (such as bond insurance) and the utilization of lower quality underwriters.
The big gamble
Despite cuts in interest rates, the problems on the US real estate and banking markets have not yet been solved and form the epicenter of a financial crisis in the OECD countries. The wave of asset-backed securities in the 1990s, in which the banks passed their credits on to the capital market, led to dubious developments.
Researchers solve long-standing financial puzzle
UQ Business School academic Dr Jamie Alcock and graduate Trent Carmichael have solved a financial problem that has puzzled researchers for more than 10 years.
New workout 'paradigm' promises to preserve value in financially troubled companies
With the recent wave of highly leveraged private equity deals and the current problems in credit markets, market observers are now predicting a sharp increase in corporate defaults, with possibly serious spillover effects. But thanks to changes in workout and bankruptcy practices in the U.S. and abroad during the last two decades, the prospects for preserving the values of financially distressed companies are greatly improved.
MIT commercial real estate index posts first drop since '03
The value of U.S. commercial real estate owned by big pension funds fell 2.5 percent in the third quarter of 2007, according to an index produced by the MIT Center for Real Estate.

News discussion:

General Science news

[Home]   [Full version]