"We're inundated with data—it's wonderful," says mission scientist and planetary geologist Scott Murchie of the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Lab.
One of the first images beamed back from the spacecraft revealed a side of Mercury researchers have been waiting three decades to see.
The cratered expanse pictured above was mostly in darkness 30 years ago when NASA's Mariner 10 spacecraft made the first and (until now) only flybys of Mercury. Last week, MESSENGER caught the terrain in sunlight for the first time.
At first glance, the photo seems to show little more than a wasteland of craters, but researchers are excited.
"These are fantastic images," says Murchie. For one thing, "we've gotten our first good look at Caloris Basin," the biggest known impact crater on Mercury and one of the biggest craters in the entire solar system.
In the mid-1970s, Mariner 10 caught a tantalizing glimpse of the basin's edge, a ring of shadowed mountains thrown up long ago by some catastrophic impact. A comet or asteroid had smashed Mercury and gouged a crater bigger than the state of Texas. What was inside? No one could say.
"Big impacts are revealing," says Murchie. "They're natural drill holes that expose the interior of the planet—which of course we're dying to see."
MESSENGER snapped the picture that geologists had long wanted: Caloris in its entirety, a top-down view in broad daylight—and the results were surprising. Many experts expected the interior of Caloris Basin to be dark, like the dark 'seas' of hardened lava that fill major impact basins on the Moon and give anthropomorphic form to the "Man in the Moon." Instead, Caloris is bright inside and pitted with regions of interesting color.
Color is something MESSENGER excels at. "Color reveals mineralogy," says Murchie. "Two of the instruments onboard MESSENGER are able to map the surface of Mercury in wavelengths ranging from ultraviolet across the visible spectrum to near-infrared. We're calibrating the data now and plan to release some full-color images soon."
Another early highlight of the flyby are ridges geologists call lobate scarps:
photo. These are fractures in Mercury's crust formed, perhaps, as a result of planetary shrinkage. (Think wrinkles on a raisin.) What could cause a rigid, rocky planet to shrink? Billions of years ago, "Mercury may have undergone a period of contraction as its molten core cooled," suggests Murchie. High-resolution MESSENGER photos of Mercury's scarps will allow geologists to test this and other ideas.
Other snapshots of note include a telephone-shaped crater, Mercury's Antarctic, and a "fresh" crater with many secondary crater chains. Browse
the gallery for more.
"We're leaving no stone unturned," says Murchie. In all, there are 110+ scientists, students and engineers sifting through the harvest of photography, spectroscopy, laser radar echoes and magnetic field measurements from the Jan. 14th flyby. Discoveries are sure to ensue.
And remember, he says, "this is just the first of three flybys" in preparation for orbit insertion in 2011. The next encounters are scheduled for Oct. 2008 and Sept. 2009. More than a third of Mercury's surface has yet to be photographed and those flybys will fill in many gaps. Meanwhile, researchers are fully occupied.
Source: by Dr. Tony Phillips, Science@NASA
Related stories:
Mercury's surface dominated by volcanism and iron-deficiency
Volcanism has played a more extensive role in shaping the surface of Mercury than scientists had thought. This result comes from multispectral imaging data gathered in January 2008 by MESSENGER, the latest spacecraft to visit the Sun's innermost planet.
CU-Boulder returns $3M to NASA in satellite design, operation cost savings
The University of Colorado at Boulder took an unusual step today by returning nearly $3 million in cost savings to NASA for an award-winning satellite mission designed, built and controlled by the university to study how the sun's variation influences Earth's climate and atmosphere.
NASA Plans to Visit the Sun
For more than 400 years, astronomers have studied the sun from afar. Now NASA has decided to go there. "We are going to visit a living, breathing star for the first time," says program scientist Lika Guhathakurta of NASA Headquarters. "This is an unexplored region of the solar system and the possibilities for discovery are off the charts."
Iron 'snow' helps maintain Mercury's magnetic field, scientists say
New scientific evidence suggests that deep inside the planet Mercury, iron “snow” forms and falls toward the center of the planet, much like snowflakes form in Earth’s atmosphere and fall to the ground.
NASA calls on APL to send a probe to the sun
The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory is sending a spacecraft closer to the sun than any probe has ever gone - and what it finds could revolutionize what we know about our star and the solar wind that influences everything in our solar system.
Unraveling the Mercury mystery: Boldly going where no one has gone before
Twelve years ago Sean Solomon put a proposal in front of NASA to develop the first probe to orbit Mercury. His tenacity has finally paid off. Three months ago his spacecraft, named Messenger (Mercury surface, space environment, geochemistry and ranging), made its first flyby of Mercury, recording never-before-seen images of the mysterious planet.
Mercury's shifting, rolling past
Patterns of scalloped-edged cliffs or lobate scarps on Mercury's surface are thrust faults that are consistent with the planet shrinking and cooling with time. However, compression occurred in the planet's early history and Mariner 10 images revealed decades ago that lobate scarps are among the youngest features on Mercury. Why don’t we find more evidence of older compressive features?
Mercury's shifting, rolling past
Patterns of scalloped-edged cliffs or lobate scarps on Mercury’s surface are thrust faults that are consistent with the planet shrinking and cooling with time. However, compression occurred in the planet’s early history and Mariner 10 images revealed decades ago that lobate scarps are among the youngest’ features on Mercury. Why don’t we find more evidence of older compressive features?
