Tax Rebates Versus Tax Bonuses

On Feb. 13, 2008, the president signed a $168 billion stimulus package designed to give $300, $600 or $1,200 checks to more than 100 million Americans. It was the second time in seven years that lawmakers agreed to return additional tax money in hopes that people would spend it to stimulate a sluggish economy. A key question: Will those receiving checks spend enough to have the desired effect?

Economic theory says "yes" -- give people money and they will spend it. But Nicholas Epley, a professor of behavioral science at the University of Chicago, Graduate School of Business, says the actual answer depends on more than simply giving people more money. Epley, whose findings come from several heuristic research studies, says that the way the government characterizes the money can have a major impact on whether or not people choose to spend it.

"Decisions about whether checks from the government will be spent or saved depend very heavily on how people's options are described," says Epley. "If the goal is to increase consumer spending, the checks should have been pitched [to the American public in recent months] as 'tax bonuses' instead of 'tax rebates.'

"People are much more liberal about spending a bonus or a windfall than they are spending money thought of as part of their income," said Epley. "People consider a 'tax bonus' a windfall, but consider a 'tax rebate' more like their regular income."

Epley's research was funded by the Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences Directorate at the National Science Foundation, Arlington, Va., as part of a larger research program designed to investigate the psychology of judgment and decision making.

The project was undertaken by Epley and research partners Lorraine Chen Idson, a former assistant professor of business administration at Harvard University Business School in Boston, Mass., and Dennis Mak, a former Harvard University undergraduate.

The research shows that how a financial windfall is described or "framed" can dramatically influence people's choices. It turns out people are more likely to spend what seems like extra money -- money described as a "bonus" -- than they are to spend money that seems like returned income -- money described as a "rebate."

"We were genuinely surprised by the size of the framing effect we observed," said Epley, who conducted several experiments in which participants were given $50 checks or $25 in cash, depending on the experiment, alternately described as rebates and bonuses.

In one in-lab experiment, those given $25 described as a rebate spent $2.43 on items sold to them in the lab, whereas those given $25 described as a bonus spent $11.16 -- over 400 percent more.

The results may explain the apparently low spending rates observed immediately following the 2001 tax rebates, in which the government refunded $300 and $600 checks to taxpayers.

According to Epley, this is a sign of the power that seemingly mundane psychological variables can have on the effectiveness of public policy. He argues that psychologists are not consulted as much as they could be when lawmakers are thinking about the design and implementation of major public policies.

"A second implication follows from the first," he says. "If varying descriptions, designs, or other psychological variables matter for the effectiveness of a policy, then it might be of considerable value to run some small-scale pilot studies to identify which designs or descriptions might be the most effective.

"Market researchers do a great deal of this, but it's not so clear that this is done as much as it could be in public policy circles."

Source: NSF

Related stories:

Big ticket: You'll spend more thinking about your bank account than about your wallet
It has long been assumed that consumers are good judges of affordability, but a new study reveals that how much you’re willing to spend is influenced by whether you think about a larger pool of resources (such as your bank account) or a smaller pool (the cash in your wallet).
How you spend affects how much you spend: Non-cash purchases found to be higher than cash buys
There is fresh evidence that people spend less when paying cash than using credit, cash-equivalent scrip or gift certificates. They also spend less when they have to estimate expenses in detail. These findings appear in the September issue of the Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, published by the American Psychological Association.
Tech firms fare better than most in jobs slump
(AP) -- Technology appears to be one of the least hard-hit sectors in an economy beset by unemployment at a five-year high. The Labor Department reported Friday that companies slashed their payrolls by 84,000 jobs last month, sending the country's unemployment rate to 6.1 percent from 5.7 percent in July.
Google reigns as world's most powerful 10-year-old
(AP) -- When Larry Page and Sergey Brin founded Google Inc. on Sept. 7, 1998, they had little more than their ingenuity, four computers and an investor's $100,000 bet on their belief that an Internet search engine could change the world.
Recovery efforts not enough for critically endangered Asian vulture
Captive breeding colonies of a critically endangered vulture, whose numbers in the wild have dwindled from tens of millions to a few thousand, are too small to protect the species from extinction, a University of Michigan analysis shows.
Free drug samples may end up costing uninsured more
Free drug samples provided to physicians by pharmaceutical companies could actually be costing uninsured patients more in the long run, according to a study done by researchers at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center and colleagues.
Scientists peel away the mystery behind gold's catalytic prowess
Few materials have exercised as much of a hold on the human imagination, or on human history, as has gold. But for all of its popular uses – money, medals, jewelry and more – gold's potential as a catalyst lay hidden until the 1980s, when Masatake Haruta and Graham Hutchings independently discovered that gold, which had long been considered inactive, could be an extraordinarily good catalyst. Haruta demonstrated the low-temperature oxidation of CO and Hutchings the hydrochlorination of acetylene to vinyl chloride.
Home IQ: Winning technologies will make people smarter -- not their houses
Someday, we may be getting fashion advice from our mirrors. Instead of digging through our closets to find the perfect complement for a new shirt, we may hold it up to our bedroom mirror for a computer to scan. Using radio-frequency identification technology, our electronic fashion stylist will then offer suggestions based on what's in our closet or how the latest edition of Vogue or Teen Beat pairs up something similar.

News discussion:

General Science news