[Home]
[Full version]
Big babies and small families make evolutionary sense
Jul 10 ,General Science
(PhysOrg.com) -- Macquarie University researchers have discovered and modelled the key factors responsible for offspring and family size.
Their model predicts what size offspring will be favoured by evolution. It will help conservation biologists understand what makes species endangered.
And it may help explain why human families tend to become smaller, rather than larger, as parents become richer and live longer.
The study will be published later this month in the journal The American Naturalist.
Why do mammals invest so much time and energy in their offspring? "It's all to do with abundance of energy, safe environments, and intense competition," says Daniel Falster, a doctoral student at Macquarie University.
He and his colleagues studied the family size for hundreds of animal and plant species from dingos, to gum trees and whales.
At the centre of Falster's work is a mathematical model which mimics the evolutionary process. By estimating the evolutionary pressure on a particular characteristic, such as the level of parental expenditure on each offspring, he can predict how that character will change.
The model can make predictions across the plant and animal kingdoms from butterflies to fish to gorillas and even humans. "Our model was able to explain some of the major offspring size patterns seen across species, such as why larger parents have proportionately smaller offspring, and why mammals have offspring some 10,000 times larger than plants," Falster says. "That gave us a lot of confidence that the fundamentals of the model were right."
The key process in Falster's model is competition among rival offspring. The better an offspring is cared for and fed, the larger it tends to be, giving it an evolutionary advantage.
The importance of such size-selective competition is already well-known in plants, where height allows them to capture more sunlight, but Falster suggests it may have been overlooked in other groups. "Our work shows that without competition, evolution would favour parents having many, tiny offspring," Falster says. "Elephants would be having thousands of little babies instead of one large one".
In reality many species have small families, making their populations more vulnerable to extinction.
"A lot of endangered species also have very large offspring. They have low population growth rates, and this makes it hard for them to endure, or recover from, any sort of harvesting or loss."
Falster hopes that his model will help biologists struggling to understand what makes some species vulnerable to extinction.
Falster also thinks his model helps explain aspects of human nature. Patterns in human demography are consistent with patterns seen among wild species, he says. "As parents get richer, live longer, and their environments become more benign, offspring become larger and family sizes become smaller. Our model explains why this demographic transition makes sense in light of evolution."
Daniel Falster is one of 16 early-career scientists chosen for Fresh Science, a national program sponsored by the Federal and Victorian governments. He is presenting his research to the public for the first time.
Source: Macquarie University
Related stories:
Study finds foul owls use faeces to show they are in fine feather
Some years ago, within the Department of Conservation Biology of the Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; Seville, Spain), a recently established group (colloquially named the Night Ecology Group) started to explore the possibility of visual communication in crepuscular and nocturnal birds.
Prevailing theory of aging challenged in Stanford worm study
Age may not be rust after all. Specific genetic instructions drive aging in worms, report researchers at the Stanford University School of Medicine. Their discovery contradicts the prevailing theory that aging is a buildup of tissue damage akin to rust, and implies science might eventually halt or even reverse the ravages of age.
Can you be born a couch potato?
The key to good health is to be physically active. The key to being active is… to be born that way? The well-documented importance of exercise in maintaining fitness has created the idea that individuals can manage their health by increasing their activity. But what if the inclination to engage in physical activity is itself significantly affected by factors that are predetermined? Two new studies suggest that the inclination to exercise may be strongly affected by genetics.
Estimation of isolation times in the Drosophila simulans complex
The Drosophila simulans species complex continues to serve as an important model system for the study of new species formation. The complex is comprised of the cosmopolitan species, D. simulans, and two island endemics, D. mauritiana and D. sechellia. A substantial amount of effort has gone into reconstructing the natural history of the complex, in part to infer the context in which functional divergence among the species has arisen. In this regard, a key parameter to be estimated is the initial isolation time (t) of each island species.
Did walking on 2 feet begin with a shuffle?
Somewhere in the murky past, between four and seven million years ago, a hungry common ancestor of today’s primates, including humans, did something novel. While temporarily standing on its rear feet to reach a piece of fruit, this protohominid spotted another juicy morsel in a nearby shrub and began shuffling toward it instead of dropping on all fours, crawling to the shrub and standing again.
New research provides insight into menopause
Insight into why females of some species undergo menopause while others do not has proven elusive despite an understanding of the biological mechanisms behind the change.
To save or savor? It's decision time for Atlantic bluefin tuna
Giant bluefin tuna are in trouble, primarily because the powerful muscles that propel their extensive ocean migrations come with an Achilles' heel: They're tasty.
Predators do more than kill prey
The direct effect predators have on their prey is to kill them. The evolutionary changes that can result from this direct effect include prey that are younger at maturity and that produce more offspring.
[Home]
[Full version]