Study examines self-expanding plastic stents in the treatment of benign esophageal conditions

Benign esophageal lesions such as strictures, perforations, and fistulae have a significant impact on patient well-being and are associated with the complications of malnutrition, pain, aspiration, respiratory decline, and death. In the past, the majority of refractory benign esophageal strictures were caused by chronic peptic irritation; however, with aggressive treatment of reflux disease, nonpeptic causes currently predominate. Esophageal stenting is a minimally invasive intervention that has been used as a treatment for expansion of stenoses and closure of perforations and fistulae. Self-expanding metal stents (SEMSs) are the current endoscopic standard for palliation of dysphagia resulting from malignant esophageal stenosis. SEMSs have also been used with variable success in the treatment of benign strictures.

Self-expanding plastic stents have been proposed for use in benign esophageal lesions because of their advantages over metallic stents, including lower cost, ease of placement and retrieval, and limited local tissue reaction while still providing alleviation of dysphagia. Previous reviews of the performance of SEPSs with limited numbers of patients have shown good success with resolution of benign stenosis and fistulae with few adverse effects.

“In our study of self-expanding plastic stents, migration occurred in more than 60 percent of all patients and of all stents placed,” said the study’s lead author Todd Baron, MD, FASGE, Mayo Clinic, Rochester. “Stent migration rates were not influenced by dilation at the time of stent placement or stent size. Although stent placement typically resolved the patient’s symptoms initially, long-term resolution was infrequent in our study group. Only six percent of all procedures provided long-term resolution of symptoms after stents were removed.”

Patients and Methods

This study was a retrospective review of cases of benign esophageal lesions in which a self-expanding nonmetallic Polyflex stent was placed at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, from 2002 to 2006.

Thirty patients underwent at least one attempted SEPS placement. Nineteen patients were male and 11 were female, with an average age of 52.1 years. Twenty-two stents were placed in eight patients for benign strictures. Twenty-five stents were placed in 11 patients for anastomotic stricture after esophageal surgery. Twenty-two stents were placed in nine patients for esophageal fistulae or anastomotic leak. Fifteen stents were placed in five patients, and one stent placement was unsuccessful in one patient for radiation-induced strictures. A total of 83 stent placements were performed over the five-year period.

Overall, complications were minor and did not interfere with subsequent treatment. The most common initial complaints included chest pain, neck discomfort, and dysphagia (in 23 procedures) and nausea and vomiting (in eight procedures) and were managed with analgesic and antiemetic medications. Symptoms resolved within three days in most cases.

Results

Stents remained in place for an average of 53 days. Patients had symptomatic improvement initially in 77 of 83 stents placed (92.8 percent), three of 83 stents placed resulted in no symptom improvement, and three of 83 stents placed are awaiting follow up information. Stents were removed after several months if the patient’s symptoms remained alleviated or earlier if symptoms recurred, stent migration was noted, or complications developed. One stent was removed because of excessive granulation tissue formation. Migration was a frequent occurrence, noted in 18 of 29 patients (62.1 percent) and 53 of 83 stents placed (63.9 percent), whereas 21 of 83 stents placed remained in stable position (25.3 percent), four patients died with stents in place (unrelated to the stent), two patients have two stents still in place each, and one patient has a single stent still in place. These patients are awaiting follow-up.

Stent migration was typically accompanied by recurrence of symptoms and was noted more frequently in patients with proximal (30/44 stents, 68.2 percent) and distal (19/27 stents, 70.4 percent) esophageal lesions compared with mid-esophageal (3/10 stents, 30percent) location. Stent migration was defined either as radiographic evidence of the stent within the stomach or endoscopic visualization of the stent having moved from the initial placement location, or both. Success was defined as resolution of dysphagia and closure of the fistula or leak as seen on endoscopy or barium study.

Only six percent of procedures resulted in long-term symptom improvement at follow-up after the stent was removed, whereas 81.9 percent resulted in recurrence or persistence of symptoms.

Source: American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Potential treatment option for severe emphysema under study
Emory University researchers are participating in a nationwide study to explore an investigational treatment for advanced widespread emphysema. The EASE (Exhale Airway Stents for Emphysema) Trial focuses on airway bypass, a minimally invasive procedure designed to reduce excessive lung inflation and shortness of breath – typical complications of emphysema - by making new pathways for trapped air to exit the lungs.
Best use of drug-eluting stents
Compared with bare metal stents, drug-eluting stents substantially reduce the risk of angiographic and clinical recurrence but do not affect mortality or the short term or long term risk of myocardial infarction. The use of drug-eluting stents necessitates extended treatment with dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus thienopyridine) which may cause bleeding complications and interferes with or even precludes surgery in case this is needed.
Tiny 3-D ultrasound probe guides catheter procedures
An ultrasound probe small enough to ride along at the tip of a catheter can provide physicians with clearer real-time images of soft tissue without the risks associated with conventional x-ray catheter guidance.
More aortic chest aneurysms being treated with less-invasive stents
An estimated 60,000 Americans are walking around with time bombs in their chests called thoracic aortic aneurysms. At any time, their main chest artery could suddenly burst open, causing massive internal bleeding that is almost always fatal.
Stent grafts: a better way to treat blunt trauma injuries
Endovascular repair—fixing an injury in a blood vessel from inside that vessel—is a better option for individuals who receive highly lethal injuries from high-speed collisions or falls (together referred to as blunt trauma) and is shown to save more lives and nearly eliminate paraplegia (the loss of the ability to move and/or feel both legs), a complication of surgical repair for thoracic aortic aneurysms.
Still puzzling: Best care for the frail and elderly with coronary artery disease
A new study from Duke University Medical Center finds that patients treated solely with medications after suffering from chest pain, heart attack or coronary artery disease are more likely to die during the first year following their initial hospitalization.
Drug-releasing stents linked with decrease in procedures to unblock coronary arteries
The widespread adoption of the use of drug-releasing coronary artery stents into routine practice is associated with a decrease in the need for repeat procedures to unblock coronary arteries and also do not appear to increase the risk of death, compared to bare-metal stents, according to a study in the June 25 issue of JAMA.
More patients with drug-coated cardiac stents survive, avoid costly follow-up procedures
The more than ten million Americans who’ve received drug-eluting stents to open their blocked coronary arteries have a bright future, according to new research from the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine.

Study examines self-expanding plastic stents in the treatment of benign esophageal conditions

Related stories:

News discussion: