A new study indicates the next big San Francisco earthquake will be deadlier than the 1906 tremor than devastated the city.
In a worst-case scenario, the study says as many as 3,400 may die, mostly crushed by buildings, up to 700,000 displaced or made homeless and about 130,000 structures extensively damaged or destroyed, The Washington Post reports.
The loss from such a repeat could exceed $125 billion, equal to the destruction wrought by Hurricane Katrina on New Orleans.
The study, called "When the Big One Strikes Again" and conducted by structural engineer Charles Kircher and his colleagues, used the best estimates of the size and strength of the April 18, 1906, event. That quake, measuring 7.9 Richter quake, set off a firestorm that killed more than 3,000 people and destroyed vast sections of San Francisco.
Seismologists generally agree a repeat of a 1906-size earthquake is inevitable, though when and where along the fault are unknown, The Post reported.
The study was sponsored by several scientific societies and the 100th Anniversary Earthquake Conference.
Copyright 2006 by United Press International
Related stories:
Possible link found between earthquakes along the Cascadia and San Andreas faults
Seismic activity on the southern Cascadia Subduction fault may have triggered major earthquakes along the northern San Andreas Fault, according to new research published by the
Bulletin of Seismological Society of America. The research refines the recurrence rate for the southern portion of the Cascadia fault to approximately every 220 years for the last 3000 years.
Early warning system predicted shaking from Oct. 30 quake
A California earthquake early warning system now being tested accurately predicted the ground shaking in San Francisco a few seconds before the city felt the Oct. 30, 2007, magnitude 5.4 quake near San Jose, according to a statewide team of seismologists.
Tonga quake not conducive to tsunami
Seismologists at Washington University in St. Louis and their colleagues in Australia, Japan and Tonga have determined why a large earthquake in Tonga did not cause a large tsunami. A tsunami warning was issued around the Pacific Rim following the magnitude 8.0 earthquake on May 3, 2006, but the resulting tsunami was very minor and caused no damage.
Large Himalaya earthquakes may occur sooner than expected
While the rupture zones of recent major earthquakes are immune to similar-sized earthquakes for hundreds of years, they could be vulnerable to even bigger destructive temblors sooner than scientists suspect, according to analysis by University of Colorado seismologist Roger Bilham.
100 years after America's deadliest quake, evidence gone and questions remain
A century after the deadliest earthquake in American history leveled San Francisco, key events in its aftermath remain shrouded in mystery. Kevin Starr, professor of history at the University of Southern California and California State Librarian Emeritus, argues that ineptitude and fear turned the natural disaster into a manufactured catastrophe.
Major losses projected for earthquake on little-known fault under Los Angeles
A new estimate of the effect of an earthquake along the Puente Hills fault shows that damage could occur on an unprecedented scale.
An earthquake of magnitude 7.2 to 7.5 would result in 3,000 to 18,000 deaths, 142,000 to 735,000 displaced households, and up to $250 billion in property damage, according to research by the U.S. Geological Survey and the Southern California Earthquake Center at the University of Southern California. The disaster would be the costliest in U.S. history.
Making (accurate predictions of) waves
A new review of tsunami hazards concludes that the 2004 catastrophe was far from the worst possible in many Indian Ocean borderlands -- and notes that warning systems to guard at-risk populations are still lagging.
US ports vulnerable to devastating earthquake damage
If a repeat of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake were to occur, and the Port of Oakland were so severely damaged that it took as long as two years to resume full operations, what would be the impact on the U.S. economy?